What about nuclear waste?
The Taxonomy Regulation requires that the long-term disposal of waste does not cause significant or long-term harm to the environment.
Nuclear energy generates a relatively low amount of waste in comparison to the large amount of generated heat and/or electricity. It produces mainly low-level radioactive waste, for which there are disposal facilities that have operated for decades, while high-level radioactive waste accounts for 1% of total nuclear waste.
The EU regulatory framework establishes the legal requirement for national policies to keep the generation of radioactive waste to a minimum.
In addition, the technical screening criteria for nuclear energy go beyond requiring mere compliance with legislation regarding radioactive waste management and disposal. Notably, disposal facilities for low-level waste must be operational already, and Member States should have in place a detailed plan to have in operation, by 2050, a disposal facility for high-level radioactive waste. Some Member States have more advanced projects regarding the long-term disposal of nuclear waste. The inclusion of nuclear energy in the EU Taxonomy can accelerate the development of solutions for final waste disposal elsewhere in the EU. In addition, the technical screening criteria for nuclear energy prohibit the export of radioactive waste for disposal in third countries.
EU는 그렇게 생각하지 않는 거 같다 야.
님이 못 찾을까봐 QnA 직접 따왔음.
(IP보기클릭)211.36.***.***
아니 킹직히 EU 사이트까지 뒤져서 갖다줬는데 그 정도는 해야지ㅋㅋㅋ
(IP보기클릭)59.26.***.***
그 분 북유게에 멘탈 털려서 자러 침대에 갔다고 합니다.
(IP보기클릭)211.36.***.***
H. pylori
짜피 답할 거 같지도 않은데 뭐. 글고 그 정도는 해당 본인이 성의를 보여야지? | 22.05.01 00:45 | | |
(IP보기클릭)211.36.***.***
H. pylori
아니 킹직히 EU 사이트까지 뒤져서 갖다줬는데 그 정도는 해야지ㅋㅋㅋ | 22.05.01 00:46 | | |
(IP보기클릭)59.26.***.***
그 분 북유게에 멘탈 털려서 자러 침대에 갔다고 합니다.